NYT Op-Ed Takes A Strong, Principled Stance Against Orthodox Jews In Public Pools. | Gradient

NYT Op-Ed takes a strong, principled stance against Orthodox Jews in public pools.


On Wednesday, America’s Newspaper of Record published an op-ed from “the editorial board” accusing a public swimming pool in Brooklyn of accommodating the religious beliefs of its neighborhood Orthodox Jews. This is, in the view of the NYT, a bad thing. The pool, which is in a heavily Orthodox area of Brooklyn, has long observed a few female-only hours (9:15 to 11 a.m on Mondays, Wednesday and Friday; and 2:45 to 3:45 p.m. on Sundays) so that Orthodox Jewish women, whose beliefs prohibit swimming with men, can enjoy the pool as well. The New York Times considers this to be “a capitulation to a theocratic view of government services.” This is absurd. At best: ignorant. At worst: antisemitic.

The Times recounts the history of this pool in brief, citing that the women’s only hours have been observed since the ’90s at the request of Orthodox women “apparently without any serious community objections.” That the Times’ editorial board seems shocked by an Orthodox Jewish community not objecting to pool hours they themselves requested is somehow not the dumbest thing about this article. It goes on to reference local assemblyman and advocate for the pool’s sex-segregated hours Dov Hikind when it says:

“Indeed, what Mr. Hikind, in a statement, called a ‘victory for human rights’ is in fact a capitulation to a theocratic view of government services. Mr. Hikind wrote: ‘The community can rest much easier this Shabbos knowing that men and women can continue to swim separately.’ It’s pretty clear what ‘community’ Mr. Hikind means, and it is not the diverse neighborhood he was elected to represent, nor one that includes everybody who lives there.”

Setting aside the unnecessary scare quotes around “community” for a moment, it’s amazing to see the New York Times attempt to frame this as an issue of justice by encouraging one small pool in Brooklyn to discontinue a decades-old practice that allowed for the inclusion of a religious minority. By arguing that “everybody” should get to use the pool at all times, they effectively argue that Orthodox women should not get to use the pool.

The op-ed inflates a public pool making accommodations for Orthodox Jewish beliefs into a Constitutional crisis, further hyped by flowery language about how “the summer sun shines equally on the Orthodox and the non-Orthodox.” In their vision, these eight hours of religious accommodation are tantamount to refusing a glass of water to a marooned pilot dying of thirst. The piece states that “the city’s human rights law is quite clear that public accommodations like a swimming pool cannot exclude people based on sex.” They then acknowledge that the law allows for exemptions “based on bona fide considerations of public policy,” but dispense with this seemingly key chestnut by saying that this particular case clearly does not qualify as being a bona fide consideration “with its strong odor of religious intrusion into a secular space” — a horribly chosen turn of phrase, given the religious group being referenced.

Why sincerely held religious beliefs would not fall under “bona fide considerations of public policy” in a pluralistic society is not an issue the op-ed wrestles with at all. Which is curious because, as Tablet notes, public pools across the country have long observed gender-segregated swimming hours for Muslims — pissing off some far-right Islamophobes in the process. Celebrated anti-Muslim nightmare Pamela Geller wrote an article about just such a pool in St. Paul titled “Sharia in Minnesota” which shrieked: “There are are thousands of Islamic centers across the country — sharia swim belongs there, not in our public pools.”

Compare that sentence with this one from the New York Times: “Let those who cannot abide public, secular rules at a public, secular pool find their own private place to swim when and with whom they see fit.”

(Tablet also reached out to a First Amendment expert named Noah Feldman, who said: “The laws are a constitutional accommodation of religion. And the NYC Human Rights law also allows for public policy accommodations; this qualifies.”)

One could argue that the New York Times editorial board just didn’t know that religious accommodations at public pools are a fairly common occurrence — except for the fact that they published an article earlier this year on a public pool in Toronto which praised how “mechanized screens shroud the center’s expansive glass walls to create a session that allows only women and girls to relax in the hot tub, swim laps or careen down the water slide, a rare bit of ‘me’ time treasured by many of the neighborhood’s Muslim residents.” The article called this “a model of inclusion.”

A model not worth copying in The New York Times’ own city, apparently.

If you enjoy ‘Reactions’, subscribe to our podcast In Case You Missed It. 

New Pod Flow: Sounds Good With Branden Harvey “Jason Russell”


Jason is the cofounder of the iconic non-profit Invisible Children which was founded to increase awareness of the horrendous activities of the LRA in Central Africa. Jason was also the director of the iconic Kony 2012 film that took the world by storm. In this two-part interview Jason and Branden talk about what it means to create a movement, what Jason experienced during his breakdown and subsequent recovery, and Jason’s experience in the world of theater.

New Pod Flow: Animalators, “ Aharon Rabinowitz”


Aharon Rabinowitz is the head of marketing for Red Giant based in New York City. During our conversation, we discussed the importance of work life balance, his start as a production intern at Sesame Street and why artist’s feel personally offended when you reject their work.

New Pod Flow: In Case You Missed It, Episode 040


United gets their cheap on, fake news, and Trump hired who?

New Pod Flow: Scribble & Jam, “Artist Matthew Perryman Jones”


Welcome to Episode IV. This week, Dan spends some time with his favorite singer/songwriter, Matthew Perryman Jones. Matthew and Dan talk about panic attacks, growing up in Atlanta, the way music is informed by pain and suffering and the way music gives freedom.

If you have spent any time watching television in the last decade you have most likely heard one of Mattew’s songs on shows like Grey’s Anatomy, Pretty Little Liars, One Tree Hill and many others. His insightful writing and voice have drawn comparisons to Leonard Cohen and Jeff Buckley, and he is on the short list of songwriters who skillfully weave the deeply philosophical and the vivid utterly human without ever losing sight of either.

To get his new album Cold Answer, (which features the three songs from him you heard on this episode), visit MPJmusic.com.

Subscribe on iTunes.

New Pod Flow: Sounds Good With Branden Harvey “Next Steps After the Presidential Election”


Branden sits down with writer and speaker Tyler Huckabee days after Donald Trump was elected President of the United States to talk about empathy, justice, listening, and where we go from here.

New Pod Flow: In Case You Missed It, Episode 039


Special Election Edition, President Trump to legalized weed and everything in between.

This week we reflect on the election and discuss our strategies for staying sane.

New Pod Flow: Animalators, “Illo


Luca and Ilenia are the founders of Illo, a studio based in Turin, Italy.  During our conversation, we discussed their self-driving video bot named Algo, how Illo was formed and how they’ve crafted a unique office culture.

New Pod Flow: In Case You Missed It, Episode 038


This week we discuss Beyonce’s night at the CMAs, last minute election plans and how SNL might save us all.

Subscribe on iTunes and Stitcher.

New Pod Flow: It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s a Podcast: Doctor Strange


We appreciate everyone sticking with us through this long hiatus but are planning our return even as we speak, with a bunch of new goodies and an updated format. In the meantime, here’s a brief primer on Marvel’s Sorcerer Supreme, Doctor Strange — just so you can go into the movie knowing what you’re getting yourself into.